4.6 Article

Hd 8801:: A unique single Am star with γ Doradus and δ Scuti pulsations

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 129, 期 4, 页码 2026-2033

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/428373

关键词

~ Scuti; stars : chemically peculiar; stars : early-type; stars : fundamental parameters; stars : oscillations; stars : variables : other

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have discovered the first example of a star pulsating intrinsically with both gamma Doradus and delta Scuti frequencies. The star, HD 8801, is an Am metallic-line star that appears to be single. Since the vast majority of Am stars are members of binary systems with periods less than 1000 days and also do not pulsate, HD 8801 possesses a very unusual, if not unique, combination of physical properties. Our photometry, acquired with an automatic telescope at Fairborn Observatory, resolves six independent pulsation periods between 0.048 and 0.404 days. The two longest periods lie within the range of gamma Dor variables, while the four shorter periods are within the range of delta Sct stars. Eleven radial velocities, obtained over an 11 month period, have a mean of 0: 8 +/- 0: 3 km s(-1), providing no evidence for a spectroscopic companion. The star is on the main sequence and lies within both the gamma Dor and delta Sct instability strips. Pulsation constants computed for the six periods agree with pulsation constants computed for other gamma Dor and delta Sct variables. HD 8801 is also the first confirmed case of a metallic-line star pulsating with gamma Dor frequencies. Its projected rotational velocity of 55 km s(-1) is typical for Am stars, which, as a group, rotate more slowly than normal A stars. HD 8801's slow rotation compared to normal A stars does not appear to arise from either a binary companion or evolutionary expansion and thus remains a puzzle. The coexistence of metallicism and pulsation in several main-sequence stars near the red edge of the delta Sct strip contradicts recent models that predict pulsations only in more evolved stars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据