4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Application of methyl jasmonate reduces growth but increases chemical defence and resistance against Hylobius abietis in Scots pine seedlings

期刊

ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA
卷 115, 期 1, 页码 117-124

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2005.00263.x

关键词

Coleoptera; Curculionidae; elicitor; herbivory; large pine weevil; Pinus sylvestris; resin duct; terpenoids; tracheid; xylem

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L., Pinaceae) produces a terpenoid resin which consists of monoterpenes and resin acids that offer protection against herbivores and pathogen attacks. Methyl jasmonate (MJ) is a potential plant elicitor which induces a wide range of chemical and anatomical defence reactions in conifers and might be used to increase resistance against biotic damage. Different amounts of MJ (control, 10 mM and 100 mM) were applied to Scots pine to examine the vigour, physiology, herbivory performance, and induction of secondary compound production in needles, bark, and xylem of 2-year-old Scots pine seedlings. Growth decreased significantly in both MJ treated plants, and photosynthesis decreased in the 100 mM MJ treated plants, when compared to 10 mM MJ or control plants. The large pine weevil (Hylobius abietis L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) gnawed a significantly smaller area of stem bark in the 100 mM treated plants than in the control or 10 mM treated plants. The 100 mM MJ treatment increased the resin acid concentration in the needles and xylem but not in the bark. Furthermore, both MJ treatments increased the number of resin ducts in newly developing xylem. The changes in plant growth and chemical parameters after the MJ treatments indicate shifts in carbon allocation, but MJ also affects plant physiology and xylem development. Terpenoid resin production was tissue-specific, but generally increased after MJ treatments, which means that this compound may offer potential protection of conifers against herbivores.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据