4.7 Article

Gene-environment interaction effects on the development of immune responses in the 1st year of life

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 76, 期 4, 页码 696-704

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/429418

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR003186, M01 RR03186] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL070831, R01 HL61879, P01 HL70831] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD061879] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK055889, R01 DK55889] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH061879] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Asthma is a common disease that results from both genetic and environmental risk factors. Children attending day care in the 1st year of life have lower risks for developing asthma, although the mechanism for this day care effect is largely unknown. We investigated the interactions between day care exposure in the 1st 6 mo of life and genotypes for 72 polymorphisms at 45 candidate loci and their effects on cytokine response profiles and on the development of atopic phenotypes in the 1st year of life in the Childhood Onset of Asthma ( COAST) cohort of children. Six interactions ( at four polymorphisms in three loci) with day care that had an effect on early-life immune phenotypes were significant at P < .001. The estimated false-discovery rate was 33%, indicating that an estimated four P values correspond to true associations. Moreover, the day care effect at some loci was accounted for by the increased number of viral infections among COAST children attending day care, whereas interactions at other loci were independent of the number of viral infections, indicating the presence of additional risk factors associated with day care environment. This study identified significant gene-environment interactions influencing the early patterning of the immune system and the subsequent development of asthma and highlights the importance of considering environmental risk factors in genetic analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据