4.4 Article

Process development and analysis of liver-stage antigen 1, a preerythrocyte-stage protein-based vaccine for Plasmodium falciparum

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 73, 期 4, 页码 2109-2115

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.73.4.2109-2115.2005

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasmodium falciparum liver-stage antigen 1(LSA-1) is expressed solely in infected hepatocytes and is thought to have a role in liver schizogony and merozoite release. Specific Immoral, cellular, and cytokine immune responses to LSA-1 are well documented, with epitopes identified that correlate with antibody production, proliferative T-cell responses, or cytokine induction. With the goal of developing a vaccine against this preerythrocyte-stage protein, we undertook the good manufacturing practices (GMP) manufacture of a recombinant LSA-1 construct, LSA-NRC, incorporating the N- and C-terminal regions of the protein and two of the centrally placed 17-amino-acid repeats. To improve the protein yield, a method of codon harmonization was employed to reengineer the gene sequence for expression in Escherichia coli. A 300-liter GMP fermentation produced 8 kg of bacterial cell paste, and a three-step column chromatographic method yielded 8 mg of purified antigen per g of paste. The final bulk protein was > 98% pure, demonstrated long-term stability, and contained < 0.005 endotoxin units per 50 jig of protein. To accomplish the initial stages of evaluation of this protein as a human-use vaccine against malaria, we immunized rabbits and mice with LSA-NRC in Montanide ISA 720. New Zealand White rabbits and A/J (H-2(K)) mice produced high-titer antibodies that recognized liver-stage parasites in infected cultured human hepatocytes. Gamma interferon-producing cells, which have been associated with LSA-1-mediated protection, were detected in splenocytes harvested from immunized mice. Finally, sera taken from people living in a region where malaria is holoendemic recognized LSA-NRC by Western blotting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据