4.5 Article

Development of oxygen sensing in the gills of zebrafish

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 208, 期 8, 页码 1537-1549

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01564

关键词

O-2 chemoreceptor; development; gill; hypoxia; neuroepithelial cells; zebrafish; Danio rerio

类别

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P40 RR 12546] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have described the morphology, innervation and O-2-chernoreceptive properties of neuroepithelial cells (NECs) of the zebrafish gill filaments. The present work describes the ontogenesis of these cells, and the formation of functional O-2-sensing pathways in developing zebrafish. Confocal immunofluorescence was performed on whole-mount gill preparations using antibodies against serotonin (5-HT) and a zebrafish-derived neuronal marker (zn-12) to identify the appearance and innervation of gill NECs during larval stages. NECs were first expressed in gill filament primordia of larvae at 5 days postfertilization (d.p.L) and were fully innervated by 7d.p.f. In vivo ventilation frequency analysis revealed that a behavioural response to hypoxia (11.2 +/- 2.8 min(-1)) developed in embryos as early as 2 d.p.f., and a significant increase (P < 0.05) in the ventilatory response to hypoxia (200.8 +/- 23.0 min(-1)) coincided with innervation of NECs of the filaments. In addition, exogenous application of quinidine, a blocker of O-2-sensitive background K+ channels in NECs, induced hyperventilation in adults in a dose-dependent manner and revealed the development of a quinidine-sensitive ventilatory response in 7 d.p.f. larvae. This study shows that NEC innervation in the gill filaments may account for the development of a functional O-2-sensing pathway and the hyperventilatory response to hypoxia in zebrafish larvae. At earlier stages, however, O-2-sensing must occur through another pathway. The possibility that a new type of 5-HT-positive NEC of the gill arches may account for this earlier hypoxic response is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据