4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Identification of a recombinant live attenuated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine candidate that is highly attenuated in infants

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 191, 期 7, 页码 1093-1104

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/427813

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [N01-AI-15444] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Recombination technology can be used to create live attenuated respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines that contain combinations of known attenuating mutations. Methods. Two live attenuated, recombinantly derived RSV vaccine candidates, rA2cp248/404DeltaSH and rA2cp248/404/1030DeltaSH, were evaluated in 31 adults and in 95 children greater than or equal to6 months old. rA2cp248/404/1030DeltaSH was subsequently evaluated in 44 infants 1 - 2 months old. These vaccine candidates share 4 attenuating genetic elements and differ only in a missense mutation ( 1030) in the polymerase gene. Results. Both vaccines were highly attenuated in adults and RSV-seropositive children and were well tolerated and immunogenic in RSV-seronegative children. Compared with that of rA2cp248/404DeltaSH, replication of rA2cp248/404/1030DeltaSH was restricted in RSV-seronegative children (mean peak titer, 10(4.3) vs. 10(2.)5 plaque-forming units [pfu]/mL), indicating that the 1030 mutation had a potent attenuating effect. Although rA2cp248/404/ 1030DeltaSH was well tolerated in infants, only 44% of infants who received two 10(5.3)-pfu doses of vaccine had detectable antibody responses. However, replication after administration of the second dose was highly restricted, indicating that protective immunity was induced. At least 4 of 5 attenuating genetic elements were retained in recovered vaccine viruses. Conclusions. rA2cp248/404/1030DeltaSH is the first RSV vaccine candidate to be sufficiently attenuated in young infants. Additional studies are needed to determine whether rA2cp248/404/1030DeltaSH can induce protective immunity against wild-type RSV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据