3.9 Article

Dosing with 5% imiquimod cream 3 times per week for the treatment of actinic keratosis - Results of two phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, vehicle-controlled trials

期刊

ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 141, 期 4, 页码 467-473

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.141.4.467

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5% imiquimod cream compared with vehicle in the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). Design: Two phase 3 randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, vehicle-controlled studies. Setting: Twenty-six ambulatory care offices, including dermatologists in private practice or research centers. Patients: Four hundred ninety-two patients, 18 years and older, with 4 to 8 AK lesions in a 25-cm(2) treatment area on the face or the balding scalp were randomized; an additional 162 patients under-went screening but were ineligible. Interventions: Patients applied 5% imiquimod (Aldata) or vehicle cream to the treatment area once daily, 3 times per week, for 16 weeks, followed by an 8-week posttreatment period. Main Outcome Measurements: Complete clearance rate (proportion of patients at the 8-week posttreatment visit with no clinically visible AK lesions in the treatment area), partial clearance rate (proportion of patients at the 8-week posttreatment visit with a >= 75% reduction in the number of baseline AK lesions in the treatment area), and frequency and severity of adverse events and local skin reactions were measured. Results: Complete and partial clearance rates for imiquimod-treated patients (48.3% and 64.0%, respectively) were clinically and statistically significantly higher than for vehicle-treated patients (7.2% and 13.6%, respectively). The median percentage reduction of baseline lesions was 86.6% for the imiquimod-treated group and 14.3% for the vehicle-treated group. Conclusion: The 5% imiquimod cream dosed 3 times weekly for 16 weeks is safe and effective for the treatment of AK.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据