4.5 Article

Imaging brain activity with voltage- and calcium-sensitive dyes

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 245-282

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10571-005-3059-6

关键词

optical recording; voltage-sensitive dyes; calcium-sensitive dyes; signal-to-noise ratio

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC05259] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM35063] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS42739] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. This paper presents three examples of imaging brain activity with voltage- or calcium-sensitive dyes and then discusses the methodological aspects of the measurements that are needed to achieve an optimal signal-to-noise ratio. 2. Internally injected voltage-sensitive dye can be used to monitor membrane potential in the dendrites of invertebrate and vertebrate neurons in in vitro preparations. 3. Both invertebrate and vertebrate ganglia can be bathed in voltage-sensitive dyes to stain all of the cell bodies in the preparation. These dyes can then be used to follow the spike activity of many neurons simultaneously while the preparations are generating behaviors. 4. Calcium-sensitive dyes that are internalized into olfactory receptor neurons in the nose will, after several days, be transported to the nerve terminals of these cells in the olfactory bulb. There they can be used to measure the input from the nose to the bulb. 5. Three kinds of noise are discussed. a. Shot noise from the random emission of photons from the preparation. b. Vibrational noise from external sources. c. Noise that occurs in the absence of light, the dark noise. 6. Three different parts of the light measuring apparatus are discussed: the light sources, the optics, and the cameras. 7. The major effort presently underway to improve the usefulness of optical recordings of brain activity are to find methods for staining individual cell types in the brain. Most of these efforts center around fluorescent protein sensors of activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据