4.4 Article

Genetic and structural analysis of the Bacteroides conjugative transposon CTn341

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 187, 期 8, 页码 2858-2869

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.187.8.2858-2869.2005

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-28884, R01 AI028884] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genetic structure and functional organization of a Bacteroides conjugative transposon (CTn), CTn341, were determined. CTn341 was originally isolated from a tetracycline-resistant clinical isolate of Bacteroides vulgatus. The element was 51,993 bp long, which included a 5-bp coupling sequence that linked the transposon ends in the circular form. There were 46 genes, and the corresponding gene products fell into three major functional groups: DNA metabolism, regulation and antibiotic resistance, and conjugation. The G+C content and codon usage observed in the functional groups suggested that the groups belong to different genetic lineages, indicating that CTn341 is a composite, modular element. Mutational analysis of genes representing the different functional groups provided evidence for the gene assignments and showed that the basic conjugation and excision genes are conserved among Bacteroides spp. A group IIA1 intron, designated 13111, was found to be inserted into the bmhA methylase gene. Reverse transcriptase PCR analysis of CTn341 RNA showed that B.fr.11 was functional and was spliced out of the bmhA gene. Six related CTn-like elements were found in the genome sequences of Bacteroides fragilis NCTC9343 and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron VP15482. The putative elements were similar to CTn341 primarily in the tra and mob regions and in the exc gene, and several appeared to contain intron elements. Our data provide the first reported sequence for a complete Bacteroides CTn, and they should be of considerable benefit to further functional and genetic analyses of antibiotic resistance elements and genome evolution in Bacteroides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据