4.2 Article

Discovery, biosynthesis, and structure elucidation of new metabolites of norandrostenedione using in vitro systems

期刊

STEROIDS
卷 70, 期 4, 页码 305-317

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2004.12.005

关键词

steroid; norandrostenedione; in vitro; metabolism; doping

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of our study was to demonstrate the positive impact that in vitro systems could have on the synthesis and characterization of unknown metabolites of banned doping agents. Using norandrostenedione (estr-4-en-3,17-dione), we were able to identify and characterize by GC/MS and LC/UV/MS several new hydroxylated metabolites formed in human hepatocyte incubations. The site of hydroxylation of M 1, M2, M3, and M5 was demonstrated to be at C-6 beta position by incubating estr-4-en-6 beta-ol-3,17-dione (W), which is the direct 6p-hydroxylated metabolite of norandrostenedione. The structure of M5 was confirmed to be estr-4-en-6 beta,17 beta-diol-3-one (6 beta-hydroxynortestosterone) using a commercially available authentic standard. For the other metabolites, M 1, M2, and M3, no standards were available. Due to limited access to fresh human liver tissues, in vitro incubation conditions in rat liver subcellular fractions and hepatocytes were optimized as an alternative to produce sufficient quantities of the unknown metabolites for MS and/or NMR characterization. The structure of M1 was assigned to 5 alpha-estran-3 alpha,6 beta-diol-17-one (6 beta-hydroxynorandrosterone) and M3 to 5 alpha-estran-3 beta,6 beta-diol-17-one (6 beta-hydroxynorepiandrosterone) based on NMR data. M2 is proposed to be 5 beta-estran-3 alpha,6 beta-diol-17-one (6 beta-hydroxynoretiocholanolone) based on GC/MS fragmentation of the TMS-enol bis-TMS-ether derivative. The in vitro approach reported here, in addition to urinary excretion studies in humans, could contribute significantly to the discovery, the synthesis, and structure elucidation of new markers of doping agents. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据