4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

A Multicenter phase II study of bortezomib in recurrent or metastatic sarcomas

期刊

CANCER
卷 103, 期 7, 页码 1431-1438

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20968

关键词

bortezomib; proteasome; phase II; sarcoma; pharmacokinetics

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01-CA47179, N01-CM17105] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. Based on evidence of activity in preclinical and Phase I studies, the authors undertook a study of bortezomib, a reversible proteasome inhibitor, for patients with metastatic sarcomas. METHODS. Two arms were opened, each using a Simon two-stage design. Arm A included patients with osteogenic sarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma. Arm B accrued patients with other types of soft tissue sarcomas. Patients were not allowed to have received previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The initial dose of bortezomib was a 1.5 mg/m(2) intravenous push twice weekly followed by a rest week. The dose was escalated to 1.7 mg/m(2) if patients tolerated Cycle I well. The dose escalation was eliminated due to toxicity observed in the first six patients. RESULTS. Painful neuropathy, myalgias, and asthenia were the most significant observed toxicities. The most frequent toxicities included fatigue, diarrhea, constipation, and nausea. Pharrnacodynamic data from 18 patients with complete data collection did not show consistent differences between patients with or without Grade 2 or Grade 3 neuropathy (toxicity graded according the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). Arm A had low accrual and was closed. One confirmed partial response among 21 evaluable patients was observed on Arm B in a patient with leiomyosarcoma. Due to the inactivity of this agent, the study was closed after the first stage of accrual. CONCLUSIONS. Bortezomib has minimal activity in soft tissue sarcoma as a single agent. If studied further in sarcomas, bortezomib should be investigated in combination with agents with demonstrated preclinical synergy. (c) 2005 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据