4.5 Article

Nuclear factor-κB decoy oligodeoxynucleotides prevent acute lung injury in mice with cecal ligation and puncture-induced sepsis

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 67, 期 4, 页码 1018-1025

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.104.005926

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transcription factor nuclear factor-kappa B ( NF-kappa B) plays a key role in expression of many inflammatory genes responsible for the pathophysiology of sepsis-induced acute lung injury. We investigated whether the introduction of synthetic double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) with consensus NF-kappa B sequence as transcription factor decoy can prevent acute lung injury with suppression of pulmonary expression of multiple genes involved in its pathological process in a cecal ligation and puncture septic mouse model. NF-kappa B decoy ODNs were introduced with the aid of the hemagglutinating virus of Japan-envelope vector method. Northern blot analysis indicated that transfection of NF-kappa B decoy ODN, but not of its scrambled form, resulted in a significant inhibition of sepsis-induced gene overexpression of inducible nitric-oxide synthase ( iNOS), cyclooxygenase-receptor, and bradykinin B 1 and B 2 receptors in lung tissues. Histological damage in lungs ( wall thickening, inflammatory infiltrate, and hemorrhage), increased pulmonary vascular permeability, and blood gas exchange impairment were clearly documented in mice after cecal ligation and puncture. These changes were strongly eliminated by the introduction of NF-kappa B decoy but not of scrambled ODN. The effects of the iNOS inhibitor FR260330 on these histological and functional derangements compared unfavorably with those of NF-kappa B decoy ODN transfection. Our results suggest that ODN decoy, acting as in vivo competitor for the transcription factor's ability to bind to cognate recognition sequence, may represent an effective strategy in the treatment of septic acute lung injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据