4.7 Article

An intranasal Syk-kinase inhibitor (R112) improves the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis in a park environment

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 115, 期 4, 页码 791-796

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.01.040

关键词

allergic rhinitis; most cell inhibition; R112; park study; mast cell mediators; Syk-kinase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: R112 inhibits Syk kinase, a transducer of signaling through the Fc is an element of receptor of mast cells, blocking mast cell responses to allergic stimuli. Objective: Examine the efficacy and safety of intranasal R112 in volunteers with symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with a placebo in a park setting. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 319 volunteers with seasonal allergic rhinitis, 160 were randomized to intranasal R112 and 159 to a vehicle control during 2 days at 2 separate locations in spring 2004. Subjects were evaluated for symptoms of allergic rhinitis (ie, sneezes, runny nose/sniffles, itchy nose, stuffy nose) on the basis of a possible maximum score of 32 for the Global Symptom Complex (GSC) scale. The primary outcome evaluated was the difference in the reduction in GSC (area under the curve over a period of 8 hours) from baseline between R112 and vehicle placebo. Results: At baseline, the combined GSC was similar to 18/32 and equal between treatment groups. After 8 hours (dosing 3 mg/nostril every 4 hours X 2), R112 significantly reduced the GSC compared with placebo (7 vs 5.4 units, respectively; P = .0005). Each individual symptom combined to form the GSC was also significantly improved in the R112 group compared with control (P < .05). As early as 45 minutes after dosing, R112 showed a significant improvement in symptoms over placebo, and the duration of action exceeded 4 hours. Adverse effects were indistinguishable between the groups and clinically insignificant. Conclusion: Intranasal R112 was effective in this park study and is a promising new treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据