3.9 Article

A novel high-throughput screening format to identify inhibitors of secreted acid sphingomyelinase

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR SCREENING
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 225-234

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1087057104272546

关键词

acid sphingomyelinase; lipid retention; atherosclerosis; high-throughput screening; hydrophobic interaction chromatography

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 56984] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secreted extracellular acid sphingomyelinase (sASM) activity has been suggested to promote atherosclerosis by enhancing subendothelial aggregation and retention of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) with resultant foam cell formation. Compounds that inhibit sASM activity, at neutral pH, may prevent lipid retention and thus would be expected to be anti-atherosclerotic. With the goal of identifying novel compounds that inhibit sASM at pH 7.4, a high-throughput screen was perfort-ned. Initial screening was run using a modification of a proven system that measures the hydrolysis of radiolabeled sphingomyelin presented in detergent micelles in a 96-well forinat. Separation of the radiolabeled aqueous phosphory1choline reaction product from uncleaved sphingomyelin lipid substrate was achieved by chloroform/methanol extraction. During the screening campaign, a novel extraction procedure was developed to eliminate the use of the hazardous organic reagents. This new procedure exploited the ability of uncleaved, radiolabeled lipid substrate to interact with hydrophobic phenyl-sepharose beads. A comparison of the organic-based and the bead-based extraction sASM screening assays revealed Z factor values ranging from 0.7 to 0.95 for both formats. In addition, both assay formats led to the identification of sub- to low micromolar inhibitors of sASM at pH 7.4 with similar IC50 values. Subsequent studies demonstrated that both methods were also adaptable to run in a 384-well format. In contrast to the results observed at neutral pH, however, only the organic extraction assay was capable of accurately measuring sASM activity at its pH optimum of 5.0. The advantages and disadvantages of both sASM assay formats are discussed. (Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2005:225-234).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据