4.4 Article

Retinoic acid generated by Raldh2 in mesoderm is required for mouse dorsal Endodermal pancreas development

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS
卷 232, 期 4, 页码 950-957

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.20256

关键词

pancreas; dorsal endoderm; retinoic acid; retinaldehyde dehydrogenase; Raldh2; RARE-lacZ; Pdx1; Prox1; mouse

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM62848, R01 GM062848-03, R01 GM062848] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies on nonmammalian vertebrate embryos have indicated that retinoic acid (RA) is required for pancreas development. We have analyzed mouse embryos carrying a null mutation of the gene encoding retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (Raldh2), which controls RA synthesis. Raldh2(-/-) embryos specifically lack expression of Pdx1 (a homeobox gene required for pancreas development) and Prox1 in dorsal endodermal but not ventral endodermal pancreatic precursor tissues. Ventral endodermal expression of Hex is not affected in Raldh2(-/-) embryos, indicating that liver specification is not dependent upon RA. Also, expression of Foxa2 across the dorsoventral axis of the endoderm is not affected in Raldh2(-/-) embryos, indicating that a lack of RA does not cause a general defect in foregut endoderm development. Comparison of wild-type and Raldh2(-/-) embryos carrying an RA-reporter transgene demonstrates that RA activity is normally present throughout the endoderm except in the ventral-most region but is totally missing in endoderm of Raldh2(-/-) embryos. Thus, Raldh2 expressed in adjacent splanchnic lateral plate mesoderm provides an RA signal to dorsal endoderm. Dorsal Pdx1 expression is rescued in Raldh2(-/-) embryos by low-dose maternal administration of RA, which preferentially restores RA-reporter expression in the dorsal endoderm. Our findings demonstrate a specific role for RA in mouse embryos as a mesodermally synthesized signal needed for dorsal endodermal expression of Pdx1 during development of the dorsal pancreatic lineage. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据