4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery:: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos)

期刊

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
卷 61, 期 4, 页码 601-606

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02774-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Transgastric flexible endoscopic surgery might offer advantages over open and laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to develop methods for performing transgastric biliary endosurgery Methods: Cholecystectomies and biliary anastomoses were performed in 8 anesthetized pigs (27-30 kg) in nonsurvival studies. Two endoscopes passed perorally were inserted through the stomach wall after needle-knife incision. Endoscope-induced pneumoperitoneum allowed viewing and manipulation of the gallbladder with both endoscopes independently. The cystic duct was dissected, clipped, and transected. Cholecystectomy was performed with one of two methods: either by using two endoscopes, or a single endoscope and a 5-mm-diameter grasping instrument inserted transabdominally. Clips and sutures were used to attach the gallbladder to the stomach wall, and an incision was made to form a cholecystogastrostomy. In survival experiments in 8 pigs, transgastric incisions were closed with endoscopic sutures. Results: The gallbladder was successfully removed in 8 pigs (nonsurvival experiments). The time for the procedure ranged from 2.5 hours to 40 minutes and decreased with experience. At postmortem examination, clips placed on the cystic duct and the artery were secure. An anastomosis was successfully formed between gallbladder and stomach in 3 pigs. In 8 pigs, full-thickness incisions in the stomach wall were closed with two to 1 4 stitches. All 8 pigs survived (median follow-up, 22 days; range 14-28 days). Conclusions: Transgastric gallbladder surgery, including cholecystectomy and biliary anastomosis, is feasible. Full-thickness gastric incisions were safely closed in survival studies. The efficacy and the safety of transgastric surgery merits further study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据