4.3 Article

Comparison of Fourier and wavelet transform procedures for examining the mechanomyographic and electromyographic frequency domain responses during fatiguing isokinetic muscle actions of the biceps brachii

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 190-199

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2004.08.007

关键词

mechanomyography; electromyography; wavelet; Fourier; isokinetic; fatigue

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The primary purpose of the present study was to compare the fast Fourier transform (FFT) with the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) for determining the mechanomyographic (MMG) and electromyographic (EMG) center frequency [mean power frequency (mpf), median frequency (mdf), or wavelet center frequency (cf)] patterns during fatiguing isokinetic muscle actions of the biceps brachii. Seven men (mean +/- SD age = 23 +/- 3 years) volunteered to perform 50 consecutive maximal, concentric isokinetic muscle actions of the dominant forearm flexors at a velocity of 180 degrees s(-1). Non-parametric run tests indicated significant (p < 0.05) trends in the MMG and EMG signals for the 5th, 25th, and 45th muscle actions for all subjects, thereby confirming non-stationarity of the MMG and EMG signals. There were significant (p < 0.05) correlations among the average normalized mpf, mdf, and cf values for contractions 1-50 for both MMG (r = 0.671-0.935) and EMG (r = 0.956-0.987). Polynomial regression analyses demonstrated quadratic decreases in normalized MMG mpf (R-2 = 0.439), MMG mdf (R-2 = 0,258), MMG cf (R-2 = 0.359), EMG mpf (R-2 = 0.952), EMG mdf (R-2 = 0.914) and EMG cf (R-2 = 0.888) across repetitions. The primary finding of this study was the similarity in the mpf, mdf, and cf patterns for both MMG and EMG, which suggested that, despite the concerns over non-stationarity, Fourier based methods are acceptable for determining the patterns for normalized MMG and EMG center frequency during fatiguing dynamic muscle actions at moderate velocities. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据