4.6 Article

Pentameric procyanidin from Theobroma cacao selectively inhibits growth of human breast cancer cells

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 537-546

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-04-0286

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [3P30-CA-51008] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A naturally occurring, cacoa-derived pentameric procyaniclin (pentamer) was previously shown to cause G(0)/G(1) cell cycle arrest in human breast cancer cells by an unknown molecular mechanism. Here, we show that pentamer selectively inhibits the proliferation of human breast cancer cells (MDA MB-231, MDA MB-436, MDA MB-468, SKBR-3, and MCF-7) and benzo(a)pyrene-immortalized 184A1N4 and 184135 cells. In contrast, normal human mammary epithelial cells in primary culture and spontaneously immortalized MCF-10A cells were significantly resistant. We evaluated whether this differential response to pentamer may involve depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane. Pentamer caused significant depolarization of mitochondrial membrane in MDA MB231 cells but not the more normal MCF-10A cells, whereas other normal and tumor cell lines tested gave variable results. Further investigations, using a proteomics approach with pentamer-treated MDA MB-231, revealed a specific dephosphorylation, without changes in protein expression, of several G(1)-modulatory proteins: Cdc2 (at Tyr(15)), forkhead transcription factor 256 (at Ser(256), the Akt phosphorylation site) and p53(Ser(392)) Dephosphorylation of p53 (at Ser(392)) by pentamer was confirmed in MDA MB-468 cells. However, both expression and phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein were decreased after pentamer treatment. Our results show that breast cancer cells are selectively susceptible to the cytoloxic effects of pentameric procyanidin, and suggest that inhibition of cellular proliferation by this compound is associated with the site-specific dephosphorylation or down-regulation of several cell cycle regulatory proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据