4.6 Article

Plasmodium falciparum hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase -: Stability studies on the product-activated enzyme

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 272, 期 8, 页码 1900-1911

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04620.x

关键词

active state stability; hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase; Plasmodium falciparum; product activation; thermal stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferases (HGPRTs) catalyze the conversion of 6-oxopurine bases to their respective nucleotides, the phosphoribosyl group being derived from phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate. Recombinant Plasmodium falciparum HGPRT, on purification, has negligible activity, and previous reports have shown that high activities can be achieved upon incubation of recombinant enzyme with the substrates hypoxanthine and phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate [Keough DT, Ng AL, Winzor DJ, Emmerson BT & de Jersey J (1999) Mol Biochem Parasitol98, 29-41; Sujay Subbayya IN & Balaram H (2000) Biochem Biophys Res Commun279, 433-437]. In this report, we show that activation is effected by the product, Inosine monophosphate (IMP), and not by the substrates. Studies carried out on Plasmodium falciparum HGPRT and on a temperature-sensitive mutant, L44F, show that the enzymes are destabilized in the presence of the substrates and the product, IMP. These stability studies suggest that the active, product-bound form of the enzyme is less stable than the ligand-free, unactivated enzyme. Equilibrium isothermal-unfolding studies indicate that the active form is destabilized by 2-3 kcal.mol(-1) compared with the unactivated state. This presents a unique example of an enzyme that attains its active conformation of lower stability by product binding. This property of ligand-mediated activation is not seen with recombinant human HGPRT, which is highly active in the unliganded state. The reversibility between highly active and weakly active states suggests a novel mechanism for the regulation of enzyme activity in P. falciparum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据