4.5 Article

Role of p38α MAPK in cardiac apoptosis and remodeling after myocardial infarction

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2005.01.012

关键词

p38 MAPK; cardiac; apoptosis; remodeling; signaling

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL61567, HL057278] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute coronary occlusion results in ischemia-mediated death of cardiomyocytes. In the days and weeks following myocardial infarction (MI), left ventricular remodeling occurs that is characterized by persistent cardiomyocyte apoptosis, thinning and fibrosis at the site of infarction, ventricular chamber dilatation, and growth of remaining viable cardiomyocytes. The p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade has been implicated in the remodeling process. In this work, mice with cardiac-specific expression of a dominant negative mutant form of p38 MAPK (DN-p38 alpha) were subjected to MI by occlusion of the left coronary artery. Acute ischemia area was determined by transthoracic echocardiography 2 h after MI surgery, and was found to be nearly identical in DN-p38 mice and their wild-type littermates. Seven days after MI, mice were subjected to repeat echocardiography and histological examination of infarct size. DN-p38 mice had markedly reduced infarct size and increased ventricular systolic function 7 days after MI when compared to wild-type littermates. In addition, DN-p38 mice had less cardiomyocyte apoptosis than wild-type mice in the infarct border zone. Recently, it was discovered that Bcl-X-L deamidation occurs in vivo, and this results in Bcl-X-L degradation that sensitizes cells to apoptosis by enhancing BAX activity. Bcl-X-L deamidation was found to occur in the cardiac tissue of wild-type mice after MI, but was reduced in DN-p38 mice. These results establish that p38 MAPK activity is required for pathological remodeling after MI and suggest that p38 MAPK may promote cardiomyocyte apoptosis through Bcl-X-L deamidation. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据