4.8 Article

Acidic properties of sulfonic acid-functionalized FSM-16 mesoporous silica and its catalytic efficiency for acetalization of carbonyl compounds

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 231, 期 1, 页码 131-138

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2005.01.017

关键词

acetalization; mesoporous silica; sulfonic acid; TPD; microcalorimetry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Propyl-sulfonic acid-functionalized FSM-16 mesoporous silica (SO3H-FSM) is prepared by a conventional post-modification method. For the acetalization of carbonyl compounds with ethylene glycol, SO3H-FSM shows a higher rate and 1,3-dioxolane yield than conventional heterogeneous solid acids such as zeolites, montmorillonite K10 clay, silica-alumina, and the sulfonic resin. SO3H-FSM is stable during the reaction, with no leaching and deactivation of sulfonic acid groups, and is reusable without loss of its activity. The acidity and hydrophilicity of SO3H-FSM are well characterized by the microcalorimetry of NH3 adsorption, NH3-TPD, and H2O-TPD, and the result is compared with those for various aluminosilicate zeolites (HZSM5, HBEA, HY) and K10 clay. It is found that NH3-TPD is not suitable for characterizing the acidity of SO3H-FSM, because the decomposition of SO3H groups on SO3H-FSM begins above 200 degrees C. An NH3 adsorption microcalorimetric experiment at 150 degrees C shows that, compared with HZSM5, SO3H-FSM has a smaller number of acid sites but has a similar number of strong acid sites with ammonia adsorption heat above 140 kJ mol(-1). Comparison of the structural properties and catalytic results shows that a large pore diameter and low hydrophilicity are required to obtain high activity. Bronsted acid sites with a relatively strong acid strength are more suitable for this reaction, but the high acid concentration is not indispensable. The high activity of SO3H-FSM should be caused by the presence of the strong Bronsted acid sites in the mesopore with a relatively low hydrophilicity, where both reactants can smoothly access the acid sites. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据