4.5 Article

Malnutrition and associated factors among aged residents in all nursing homes in Helsinki

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 578-583

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602111

关键词

malnutrition; nutritional status; Mini Nutritional Assessment test (MNA); nursing home; aged residents; nutritional care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To acquire information about nutritional problems and factors associated with them in all nursing homes in Helsinki, Finland. Design: Descriptive, cross-sectional study. The residents were assessed by the Mini Nutritional Assessment test (MNA) and information was gathered about residents' backgrounds, functional status, diseases and about daily routines in institutions providing nutritional care. Setting: All nursing homes in Helsinki community, the capital of Finland. Subjects: Of 2424 eligible subjects, 2114 (87%) aged residents, mean age 82y, were examined. Results: One-third (29%) of the studied residents suffered from malnutrition (MNA<17), and 60% were at risk (MNA 17-23.5). Malnutrition was associated with the female gender, a longer stay in the nursing home, functional impairment, dementia, stroke, constipation and difficulties in swallowing. In addition, eating less than half of the offered food portion, not eating snacks and resident's weight control at long intervals were associated with malnutrition. In logistic regression analysis mainly patient-related factors predicted malnutrition: impaired functioning (OR 3.71, 95% CI 2.76-4.99), swallowing difficulties (OR 3.03, 95% CI 2.10-4.37), dementia (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.45-2.93), constipation (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.38-2.47), but also eating less than half of the offered food portion (OR 3.03, 95% CI 2.21-4.15). Conclusions: Although internal factors explain most about the poor nutritional status of aged residents in nursing homes, the factors related to nutritional care need further investigation to clarify their role in maintaining the nutritional status of aged residents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据