4.6 Article

Muscular mechanical hyperalgesia revealed by behavioural pain test and c-Fos expression in the spinal dorsal horn after eccentric contraction in rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 564, 期 1, 页码 259-268

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.079483

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) is quite common, but the mechanism for this phenomenon is still not understood; even the existence of muscle tenderness (mechanical hyperalgesia) has not been demonstrated in experimental models. We developed an animal model of DOMS by inducing eccentric contraction (lengthening contraction, ECC) to the extensor digitorum longus muscle (EDL), and investigated the existence of mechanical hyperalgesia in the EDL by means of behavioural pain tests (Randall-Selitto test and von Frey hair test, applied to/through the skin on the EDL muscle) and c-Fos expression in the spinal dorsal horn. We found that the mechanical withdrawal threshold measured with the Randall-Selitto apparatus decreased significantly between 1 and 3 days after ECC, while that measured by von Frey hairs did not. The group that underwent stretching of the muscle only (SHAM group) showed no change in mechanical pain threshold in either test. These results demonstrated that the pain threshold of deep tissues (possibly of the muscle) decreased after ECC. c-Fos immunoreactivity in the dorsal horn (examined 2 days after ECC/SHAM exercise) was not changed by either ECC or compression (1568 mN) to the EDL muscle by itself, but it was significantly increased by applying compression to the EDL muscle 2 days after ECC. This increase was observed in the superficial dorsal horn of the L4 segment of the ipsilateral side, and was clearly suppressed by morphine treatment (10 mg kg(-1), I.P.). These results demonstrated the existence of mechanical hyperalgesia in the muscle subjected to ECC. This model could be used for future study of the neural mechanism of muscle soreness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据