4.7 Article

Tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) clone with lower period of winter dormancy exhibits lesser cellular damage in response to low temperature

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 383-388

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2005.02.016

关键词

Camellia sinensis (L.) O. kuntze; cellular damage; oxidative stress; superoxide anions; winter dormancy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is no literature available on the response of tea plant to low temperature. We studied the effect of low temperature on two clones of, tea with contrasting periods of winter dormancy, a phenomenon in which the growth of apical shoots of tea is diminished during winter months. Clone 'Teenali 17/154' (TNL) showed shorter periods of winter dormancy than clone 'Kangra Jat' (KNJ). Low temperature (5 degrees C) resulted in increase of metabolic superoxide (O-2(-)) content and cellular damage (as measured by tetrazolium chloride reduction test) in both the clones, however, the increase was lesser in the case of TNL compared to KNJ. Activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD; EC 1.15.1.1), ascorbate peroxidase (APX; EC 1.11.1.11) and glutathione reductase (GR; EC 1.6.4.2) increased in both the clones in response to low temperature however, GR activity exhibited significant differences (P < 0.05) between the two clones. Low temperature caused increase in the intensity of various isozymes of SOD, APX and GR. A new isozyme of SOD (Cu/Zn type) was induced in both the clones at low temperature. Significantly higher GR activity in both the clones suggested a role of this enzyme in imparting better protection to tea at low temperature. Also, clonal variation for GR isozyme was observed between the clones. Based on these results it appears that TNL, a clone with relatively lesser period of winter dormancy experiences lesser oxidative stress in response to low temperature compared to KNJ, a clone with relatively higher period of winter dormancy. (c) 2005 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据