4.7 Article

Characterization and application of the biotin-switch assay for the identification of S-nitrosated proteins

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 38, 期 7, 页码 874-881

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.12.012

关键词

free radicals; S-nitrosothiols; nitric oxide; proteomics; ascorbate

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM55792] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

S-Nitrosation of protein cysteinyl residues has been suggested to be an important nitric oxide-dependent posttranslational modification. The so-called biotin-switch method has been developed to identify S-nitrosated proteins. This method relies on the selective reduction of S-nitrosothiols by ascorbate. In this study we have assessed the ability of ascorbate to reduce S-nitrosothiols and show that ascorbate is a very inefficient reducing agent. We show that higher concentrations of ascorbate and longer incubation times can significantly improve immunological detection of S-nitrosothiols. We have compared immunological detection of S-nitrosothiols with the level of intracellular S-nitrosothiols measured by tri-iodide chemiluminescence and show that the biotin-switch method is capable of detecting only high (nmol/mg protein) levels of intracellular S-nitrosothiols obtained after exposing cells to S-nitrosocysteine, but not the low levels observed during physiological nitric oxide formation. Preliminary proteomic analysis of protein S-nitrosothiols has identified elongation factor 2, heat shock protein 90 beta, and a 65-kDa macrophage protein homologous to human L-plastin as major nitrosation targets at high intracellular nitrosation levels in the murine macrophage-derived RAW 264.7 cell line. While the biotin-switch method may be a useful tool to aid in the positive identification of protein S-nitrosothiols, it cannot match the sensitivity of chemiluminescence-based methods and its use in proteomic studies likely suffers from selective detection of more easily reducible S-nitrosothiols. (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据