4.5 Article

Oxygen distribution in murine tumors: characterization using oxygen-dependent quenching of phosphorescence

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 98, 期 4, 页码 1503-1510

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01140.2004

关键词

oxygen measurement; Oxyphor G2; nitroimidazole; tissue oxygenation; hypoxia

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U54 CA-105008-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [EB-001713-01] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30-DK-50306] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work, a novel method for detecting hypoxia in tumors, phosphorescence quenching, was used to evaluate tissue and tumor oxygenation. This technique is based on the concept that phosphorescence lifetime and intensity are inversely proportional to the oxygen concentration in the tissue sample. We used the phosphor Oxyphor G2 to evaluate the oxygen profiles in three murine tumor models: K1735 malignant melanoma, RENCA renal cell carcinoma, and Lewis lung carcinoma. Oxygen measurements were obtained both as histograms of oxygen distribution within the sample and as an average oxygen pressure within the tissue sampled; the latter allowing real-time oxygen monitoring. Each of the tumor types examined had a characteristic and consistent oxygen profile. K1735 tumors were all well oxygenated, with a peak oxygen pressure of 37.8 +/- 5.1 Torr; RENCA tumors had intermediate oxygen pressures, with a peak oxygen pressure of 24.8 +/- 17.9 Torr; and LLC tumors were all severely hypoxic, with a peak oxygen pressure of 1.8 +/- 1.1 Torr. These results correlated well with measurements of tumor cell oxygenation measured by nitroimidazole (EF5) binding and were consistent with assessments of tumor blood flow by contrast enhanced ultrasound and tumor histology. The results show that phosphorescence quenching is a reliable, reproducible, and noninvasive method capable of providing real-time determination of oxygen concentrations within tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据