4.6 Article

Modeling of the northern hemisphere ice sheets during the last glacial cycle and glaciological sensitivity

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2004JD005489

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a new three-dimensional thermomechanically coupled ice sheet model of the northern hemisphere to reconstruct the Quaternary ice sheets during the last glacial cycle. The model includes basal sliding, internally calculated surface mass balance, glacial isostasy, and a treatment for marine calving. The time dependent forcing consists of temperature and precipitation anomalies from the United Kingdom Meteorological Office (UKMO) General Circulation Model scaled to the Greenland Ice Core Project ( GRIP) ice core delta O-18 record. Model parameters were chosen to best match geomorphological inferences on Last Glacial Maximum extent and global eustatic sea level change. For our standard run we find a maximum ice volume of 57 x 10(6) km(3) at 18.5 ka cal BP. This corresponds to a eustatic sea level lowering of 110 m after correction for hydro-isostatic displacement and anomalous ice resulting from defects in the specified boundary conditions of the Paleoclimate Model Intercomparison Project (PMIP) for which the UKMO GCM results were generated. Of this 110 m, 82 m was stored in the North American ice sheet and 25 m in the Eurasian ice sheet. We determine the qualitative and quantitative response of the model from a comprehensive sensitivity study in which 11 important parameters were varied over their respective ranges of uncertainty. Model outputs comparable to the observational record were explored in detail as a linear function along the axes of parameter space of the reference model. The method reveals the dominance of climate uncertainty when modeling the Last Glacial Maximum configuration of the northern hemisphere ice sheets, but also highlights the role of ice rheology and basal processes for ice sheet thickness, and glacial isostasy and calving for the timing of maximum ice volume.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据