4.5 Article

Ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol as potent modulators of apoptosis on arsenic induced toxicity in rats

期刊

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
卷 156, 期 2, 页码 297-306

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.12.003

关键词

arsenic; apoptosis; DNA fragmentation; caspase-3; TNF-alpha; Vitamin C; Vitamin E

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apoptosis or programmed cell death (PCD) is a genetically regulated cellular, physiological and biochemical Suicidal mechanism that plays a crucial role in the development and defense of homeostasis, in which the cell participates in its own demise via a cascade of molecular interactions. PCD can be modulated by various stimuli including infectious agents or drugs. Arsenic is one among inducible toxic agent that triggers apoptosis via free radical generation. Since the generation of free radicals during the metabolism of arsenic is thought to be involved in arsenic toxicosis, understanding the deleterious effects caused by the ROS that attack the vital molecules like DNA has become important. The present work was conducted to evaluate the regulatory effect exerted by Vitamin C and Vitamin E upon the apoptotic process, which can be assessed by the presence of cells with apoptosis associated DNA breaks and characterize the role of TNF-alpha and caspase-3 in rats intoxicated with arsenic. Male albino rats of wistar strain (120-150 g) were used in this study and are further divided into seven groups. We observed that ascorbate and a-tocopherol selectively altered the extent of DNA damage by reducing TNF-alpha level and inhibiting the activation of caspase cascade, from these observations it is strongly believed that the present vitamins supplementation perspective, though observed in animal model, will have sustainable curative value among the already afflicted populations, neutralizing impact on freshly emerging arsenicosis scenario and possible proactive protection to those potentially susceptible to arsenicals exposure. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据