4.8 Article

Kinetics and molecular properties of pheromone binding and release

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0501447102

关键词

Bombyx mori pheromone-binding protein; bombykol; effect of C terminus on pheromone release; fast uptake of pheromone and delivery; mutated pheromone-binding proteins

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [1U01 AI 058267-01, U01 AI058267] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transient kinetic studies have shown that the uptake of the pheromone (bombykol) of the silkworm moth (Bombyx mori), by its pheromone-binding protein (PBP) BmorPBP, proceeds with an on rate of 0.068 +/- 0.01 mu M-1.s(-1). With the high concentration of PBP in the sensillar lymph (10 mM), the half-life for the uptake of pheromone in vivo is approximate to 1 ms. A pH-dependent conformational change (BmorPBP(B) -> BmorPBP(A)), associated with the release of pheromone, is a first-order reaction (k = 74.1 +/- 0.32 s(-1); t(1/2), 9.3 ms). Under physiological conditions, both reactions proceed with half-life times on the order of milliseconds, as is required for odorant-oriented navigation in insects. Molecular interactions of bombykol with both native and mutated PBPs were analyzed by a novel binding assay. A recombinant protein with the native conformation (BmorPBP) showed high binding affinity (K-D = 105 nM) at pH 7 but low affinity (K-D = 1,600 nM) at pH 5, when tested at both low and high KCl concentrations. A protein with a C-terminal segment deleted (BmorPBP Delta P129-V142) was found to bind bombykol at pH 7 and at pH 5 with the same affinity as the native protein at pH 7, indicating that the C-terminal segment is essential for preventing binding at low pH. Binding studies with three mutated proteins (BmorPBPW37F, BmorPBPW127F, and BmorPBPW37A) showed that replacing Trp-37 (with Phe or Ala) or Trp-127 (with Phe) did not affect the binding affinity to bombykol. Fluorescence studies shed light on the contributions of Trp-37 and Trp-127 emissions to the overall fluorescence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据