4.7 Article

β1,6-Branched oligosaccharides are increased in lymph node metastases and predict poor outcome in breast carcinoma

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 2969-2973

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2211

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R33 CA 106709, R21 CA 100825] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [K08 ES11571] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This study was designed to provide a comprehensive assessment on the role of beta 1,6-branched oligosaccharides in the metastasis and outcome of breast carcinoma. Generation of these structures on N-glycans is initiated by beta 1, 6 -N- acetylglucosaminyltransferase V and used by both myeloid cells and cancer cells in systemic migration. Experimental Design: Tissue microarrays of > 700 tumors (> 400 patients; 30-year follow-up data) were stained through lectin histochemistry with leukocytic phytohemagglutinin (LPHA), a selective marker for 1,6-branched oligosaccharides. Node-negative and node-positive primary tumors and patient-matched lymph node metastases were scored by blinded observers. Results: Metastases stained at significantly greater intensities than did the patient-matched primary tumors (P < 0.0001), demonstrating for the first time that the abundance of beta 1,6-branched oligosaccharides was directly associated with breast carcinoma nodal metastasis. Multivariate analyses revealed that beta 1,6-branched oligosaccharides in primary tumors were a predictor of poor outcome, most notably in node-negative tumors, where an LPHA staining score of 3+ gave a risk factor of 3.3, independent of tumor size, nuclear grade, or patient age (P = 0.007). Conclusions: The data firmly establish a role for beta 1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V activity and beta 1,6-branched oligosaccharides in breast carcinoma metastasis, and reemphasize the involvement, although poorly understood, of aberrant glycosylation in tumor progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据