4.7 Article

Prediction of survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma using artificial neural networks

期刊

CANCER
卷 103, 期 8, 页码 1596-1605

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20938

关键词

artificial neural network; sensitivity analysis; esophageal carcinoma; survival; prognosis

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA95323, CA 98450, CA01808, CA85069, CA77057] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. Accurate estimation of outcome in patients with malignant disease is an important component of the clinical decision-making process. To create a comprehensive prognostic model for esophageal carcinoma, artificial neural networks (ANNs) were applied to the analysis of a range of patient-related and tumor-related variables. METHODS. Clinical and pathologic data were collected from 418 patients with esophageal carcinoma who under-went resection with curative intent. A data base that included 199 variables was constructed. Using ANN-based sensitivity analysis, the optimal combination of variables was determined to allow creation of a survival prediction model. The accuracy (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUR]) of this ANN model subsequently was compared with the accuracy of the conventional statistical technique: linear discriminant analysis (LDA). RESULTS. The optimal ANN models for predicting outcomes at I year and 5 years consisted of 65 variables (AUR = 0.883) and 60 variables (AUR = 0.884), respectively. These filtered, optimal data sets were significantly more accurate (P < 0.0001) than the original data set of 199 variables. The majority of ANN models demonstrated improved accuracy compared with corresponding LDA models for 1-year and 5-year survival predictions. Furthermore, ANN models based on the optimal data set were superior predictors of survival compared with a model based solely on TNM staging criteria (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS. ANNs can be used to construct a highly accurate prognostic model for patients with esophageal carcinoma. Sensitivity analysis based on ANNs is a powerful tool for seeking optimal data sets. (c) 2005 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据