4.6 Article

Dominant role for TL1A/DR3 pathway in IL-12 plus IL-18-induced IFN-γ production by peripheral blood and mucosal CCR9+ T lymphocytes'

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 174, 期 8, 页码 4985-4990

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.4985

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-056328] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The TNF-like cytokine TL1A augments IFN-gamma production by anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 and IL-12/IL-18-stimulated peripheral blood (PB) T cells. However, only a small subset of PB T cells respond to TL1A stimulation with IFN-gamma production. PB CCR9(+) T cells represent a small subset of circulating T cells with mucosal T cell characteristics and a Th1/Tr1 cytokine profile. In the current study, we show that TUA enhanced IFN-gamma production by TCR- or CD2/CD28-stimulated CCR9(+)CD4(+) PB T cells. However, TL1A had the most pronounced effect on augmenting IFN-gamma production by IL-12/IL-18-primed CCR9(+)CD4(+) PB T cells. TL1A enhanced both the percentage and the mean fluorescence intensity of IFN-gamma in CCR9(+)CD4(+) T cells as assessed by intracellular cytokine staining. IL-12 plus IL-18 up-regulated DR3 expression in CCR9(+)CD4(+) T cells but had negligible effect on CCR9(-)CD4(+) T cells. CCR9(+)CD4(+) T cells isolated from the small intestine showed a 37- to 105-fold enhancement of IFN-gamma production when TUA was added to the IL-12/IL18 cytokine combination. Cell membrane-expressed TL1A was preferentially expressed in CCR9(+)CD4(+) PB T cells, and a blocking anti-TL1A mAb inhibited IFN-gamma production by cytokine-primed CCR9(+)CD4(+) T cells by similar to 50 %. Our data show that the TL1A/DR3 pathway plays a dominant role in the ultimate level of cytokine-induced IFN-gamma production by CCR9(+) mucosal and gut-homing PB T cells and could play an important role in Th1-mediated intestinal diseases, such as Crohn's disease, where increased expression of IL-12, IL-18, TL1A, and DR3 converge in the inflamed intestinal mucosa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据