4.7 Article

Combined GADD45A and thymidine phosphorylase expression levels predict response and survival of neoadjuvant-treated gastric cancer patients

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 3025-3031

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1605

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We evaluated the expression of seven therapy-related genes to predict the clinical outcome of advanced gastric cancer patients treated with a neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic protocol. Experimental Design: Pretherapeutic, formalin-fixed, and paraffin-embedded biopsies of 61 patients, who received a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) - and cisplatin-based chemotherapy were studied. The expressions of the 5-FU - related genes TS, DPD, and TP and of the cisplatin-related genes ERCC1, ERCC4, KU80, and GADD45A were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. The expression levels of single genes and of various combinations were tested for an association with response and overall survival. Results: High DPD levels were more frequently found in nonresponding patients and were associated with worse survival. GADD45A and TP levels showed weak associations with response, but GADD45A expression correlated with survival. There was no association with response for TS expression, but tumors with a high TS level were associated with worse survival. The combination of GADD45A and TP revealed the strongest predictive effect. High expression values of TO and/or GADD45A were exclusively found in nonresponding patients (P = 0.002) and were associated with a significantly poorer survival (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Combined gene expression levels of TP and GADD45A represent a new variable to predict the clinical outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer. The association of DPD expression with response and survival underlines a predominant role of DPD to predict 5-FU sensitivity. The association of TS expression levels with survival but not with response suggests an importance of this gene for tumor progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据