4.7 Article

The 1.1 Å resolution crystal structure of the p130cas SH3 domain and ramifications for ligand selectivity

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 347, 期 5, 页码 1005-1014

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.02.017

关键词

SH3 domain; p130cas; proline-rich motif; focal adhesion kinase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Crk-associated tyrosine kinase substrate p130cas (CAS) is a docking protein containing an SH3 domain near its N terminus, followed by a short proline-rich segment, a large central substrate domain composed of 15 repeats of the four amino acid sequence YxxP, a serine-rich region and a carboxy-terminal domain, which possesses consensus binding sites for the SH2 and SH3 domains of Src (YDYV and RPLPSPP, respectively). The SH3 domain of CAS mediates its interaction with several proteins involved in signaling pathways such as focal adhesion kinase (FAK), tyrosine phosphatases PTP1B and PTP-PEST, and the guanine nucleotide exchange factor C3G. As a homolog of the corresponding Src docking domain, the CAS SH3 domain binds to proline-rich sequences (PxxP) of its interacting partners that can adopt a polyproline type 11 helix. We have determined a high-resolution X-ray structure of the recombinant human CAS SH3 domain. The domain, residues 1-69, crystallized in two related space groups, P2(1) and C222(1), that provided diffraction data to 1.1 angstrom and 2.1 angstrom, respectively. The crystal structure shows, in addition to the conserved SH3 domain architecture, the way in which the CAS characteristic amino acids form an atypically charged ligand-binding surface. This arrangement provides a rationale for the unusual ligand recognition motif exhibited by the CAS SH3 domain. The structure enables modelling of the docking interactions to its ligands, for example from focal adhesion kinase, and supports structure-based drug design of inhibitors of the CAS-FAK interaction. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据