4.8 Article

Absence of a desmopressin response after therapeutic expression of factor VIII in hemophilia A dogs with liver-directed neonatal gene therapy

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0409249102

关键词

retroviral vector; inhibitor; B domain-deleted

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R24 HL063098, R24 HL63098] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK048028, DK48028] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hemophilia A (HA) is a bleeding disorder caused by factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency. FVIII replacement therapy can reduce bleeding but is expensive, inconvenient, and complicated by development of antibodies that inhibit FVIII activity in 30% of patients. Neonatal hepatic gene therapy could result in continuous secretion of FVIII into blood and might reduce immunological responses. Newborn HA mice and dogs that were injected i.v. with a retroviral vector (RV) expressing canine B domain-deleted FVIII (cFVIII) achieved plasma cFVIII activity that was 139 +/- 22% and 116 +/- 5% of values found in normal dogs, respectively, which was stable for 1.5 yr. Coagulation tests were normalized, no bleeding had occurred, and no inhibitors were detected. This is a demonstration of long-term fully therapeutic gene therapy for HA in a large animal model. Desmopressin (DDAVP; 1-deamino-[D-Arg(8)]vasopressin) is a drug that increases FVIII activity by inducing release of FVIII complexed with von Willebrand factor from endothelial cells. It has been unclear, however, if the FVIII is synthesized by endothelial cells or is taken up from blood. Because the plasma cFVIII in these RV-treated dogs derives primarily from transduced hepatocytes, they provided a unique opportunity to study the biology of the DDAVP response. Here we show that DDAVP did not increase plasma cFVIII levels in the RV-treated dogs, although von Willebrand factor was increased appropriately. This result suggests that the increase in FVIII in normal dogs after DDAVP is due to release of FVIII synthesized by endothelial cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据