4.6 Article

Effect of norcantharidin on proliferation and invasion of human gallbladder carcinoma GBC-SD cells

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 11, 期 16, 页码 2431-2437

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i16.2431

关键词

Norcantharidin; Gallbladder neoplasm; Cell culture; Proliferation; Invasion; Oncoprotein PCNA, Ki-67, MMP2 and TIMP2; Immunohistochemistry

资金

  1. Scientific Foundation of Tongji University, China [KPB027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To investigate the effect of norcantharidin on proliferation and invasion of human gallbladder carcinoma GBC-SD cells in vitro and its anticancer mechanism. METHODS: Human gallbladder carcinoma GBC-SD cells were cultured by cell culture technique. The growth and the invasiveness of GBC-SD cells in vitro were evaluated by the tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay and by the Matrigel experiment and the crossing-river test. Expression of PCNA, Ki-67, MMP2 and TIMP2 proteins of GBC-SD cells was determined by streptavidin-biotin complex method. RESULTS: In vitro norcantharidin inhibited the growth and proliferation of GBC-SD cells in a dose-and time-dependent manner, with the IC50 value of 56.18 mu g/mL at 48 h. Norcantharidin began to inhibit the invasion of GBC-SD cells at the concentration of 5 mu g/mL, and the invasive action of GBC-SD cells was inhibited completely and their crossing-river time was prolonged significantly at 40 mu g/mL. After treatment with norcantharidin, the expression of PCNA, Ki-67, and MMP2 was significantly decreased. With the increase in TIMP2 expression, the MMP2 to TIMP2 ratio was decreased significantly (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Norcantharidin inhibits the proliferation and growth of human gallbladder carcinoma cells in vitro at relatively low concentrations by inhibiting PCNA and Ki-67 expression. Its anti-invasive activity may be the result of decrease in MMP2 to TIMP2 ratio and reduced cell motility. (C) 2005 The WJG Press and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据