4.6 Article

Metathesis of 1-hexene over rhenium oxide supported on ordered mesoporous aluminas:: comparison with Re2O7/γ-Al2O3

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
卷 284, 期 1-2, 页码 47-57

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.01.017

关键词

metathesis; 1-hexene; gamma-Al2O3; MSU; rhenium oxide; sol-gel mesoporous alumina

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-metathesis of 1-hexene was carried out at 40 degrees C over Re2O7 supported on two micelle templated aluminas (sol-gel mesoporous alumina (SGAL) and MSU), prepared with cationic and neutral surfactant, respectively, and a reference Re2O7/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst with the same rhenium oxide content (similar to 9 wt%). Both mesostructured catalysts (Re2O7/MSU and Re2O7/SGAL) showed similar activity and far higher than that of the reference Re2O7/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst, with a selectivity towards the self-metathesis products above 99%. Among the tested solvents, dodecane yielded the highest conversion likely because of its low polarity and better product removal. Similar TOF values were obtained for Re2O7/SGAL catalysts with mesopore diameter within the 5.0-12.0 nm range. In relation with the rhenium content, all optimum in TOF values was detected for rhenium oxide loadings within 6-10 wt%. The increase in activation temperature within 550-700 degrees C led towards a greater rise in activity over Re2O7/SGAL catalysts than over Re2O7/gamma-Al2O3. DRIFT chemisorbed pyridine spectra disclosed only Lewis acid sites over the activated catalysts and in higher amounts over both mesostructured catalysts. P-31 MAS NMR spectra of chemisorbed triethylphosphine oxide (TEPO) indicated the presence of three kind of acid sites (delta similar to 58, 68 and 80 ppm), with a higher content of strong Lewis acid sites (80 ppm) over both mesostructured catalysts. The remarkable performance of both ordered mesoporous catalysts was ascribed to the presence of these strong Lewis acid sites, likely stemming from the interaction of linked rhenium species with the weak Lewis acid sites of the support. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据