4.7 Article

Development of flow injection spectrophotometric methods for the determination of free available chlorine and total available chlorine: comparative study

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 537, 期 1-2, 页码 197-206

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.01.002

关键词

free available chlorine; total available chlorine; spectrophotometric reagents; flow injection analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comparative study on the development of flow-injection (FI) spectrophotometric methods for the determination of free available chlorine (FAC) and total available chlorine (TAC) is described. The use of o-dianisidine (ODS), 2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate (ABTS), 4-nitrophenylhydrazine (4-NPH), methyl orange (MO), syringaldazine (SYR) and a new reagent, indigo carmine (1C), in a flow-injection set-up was optimized for common FI operating parameters such as carrier composition, flow-rate, pH, length of reaction coil and injection volume. The FI conditions were designed by the choice of acid at suitable concentration in the carrier stream such that response from FAC is maximized while at the same time minimally interfered by combined available chlorine (CAC). Analytical characteristics of the FI method using these reagents such as detection limits, linear range, selectivity and their relative stability were compared and contrasted. The reagent that yielded the most sensitive signal is ABTS and is least interfered by Mn2+, Zn2+ and Cu2+ but interference from CAC was the most severe, while SYR and 4-NPH were least affected by CAC. IC exhibited the best selectivity characteristics amongst all the reagents studied. TAC can be conveniently determined by adding NaBr to the carrier stream. Finally, some of the promising reagents were applied to the analysis of a few commercial disinfecting formulations. Good agreement on the TAC (FAC + CAC) content was found between the proposed FIA and the manual iodimetric methods. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据