4.3 Article

Bacterial expression and one-step purification of an isotope-labeled heterotrimeric G-protein α-subunit

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 31-40

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10858-005-3340-5

关键词

eukaryotic protein; G-protein; high-resolution; stable-isotope labeling; subtilisin; transducin

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM42560] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heterologous expression systems are often employed to generate sufficient quantities of isotope-labeled proteins for high-resolution NMR studies. Recently, the interaction between the prodomain region of subtilisin and an active, mutant form of the mature enzyme has been exploited to develop a cleavable affinity tag fusion system for one-step generation and purification of full-length soluble proteins obtained by inducible prokaryotic expression. As a first step towards applying high-resolution NMR methods to study heterotrimeric G-protein alpha-subunit (G(alpha)) conformation and dynamics, the utility of this subtilisin prodomain fusion system for expressing and purifying an isotope-labeled G(alpha) chimera (similar to 40 kDa polypeptide) has been tested. The results show that a prodomain fused Ga chimera can be expressed to levels approaching 6-8 mg/l in minimal media and that the processed, mature protein exhibits properties similar to those of Ga isolated from natural sources. To assay for the functional integrity of the purified G(alpha) chimera at NMR concentrations and probe for changes in the structure and dynamics of G(alpha) that result from activation, N-15-HSQC spectra of the GDP/Mg2+ bound form of G(alpha) obtained in the absence and presence of aluminum fluoride, a well known activator of the GDP bound state, have been acquired. Comparisons of the N-15-HSQC spectra reveals a number of changes in chemical shifts of the (HN)-H-1, N-15 crosspeaks that are discussed with respect to expected changes in the protein conformation associated with G(alpha) activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据