4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Mood, anxiety and sense of humor in head and neck cancer patients in relation to disease stage, prognosis and quality of life

期刊

ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA
卷 125, 期 5, 页码 557-565

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00016480510027547

关键词

anxiety; depression; neoplasms; prognosis; quality of life; sense of humor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conclusion. At diagnosis, control patients had the lowest depression levels and anxiety scores, followed by those with limited HNSCC disease and these with extended HNSCC disease. Anxiety and depression levels at diagnosis predicted prognosis via an association with extent of disease. Sense of humor, but not anxiety or depression level, predicted lower QoL and depression levels at follow-up. Objective. To study the association between anxiety score, depression level at sense of humor at diagnosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma ( HNSCC) patients versus TNM stage, prognosis and depression level/quality of life (QOL) 6 years following diagnosis. A control group of patients with benign HN disease was also included. Material and methods. Male patients with newly diagnosed HNSCC ( n = 78) or benign HN ( n = 61) disease completed the following questionnaires: the Beck Depression Inventory, the Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory ( state) and the Svebak humor questionnaire. Patients with cachexia or those aged > 80 years were excluded. In the HNSCC patients, TNM stage, prognosis and QOL/depression level ( n = 27) were determined following successful therapy. Results. HNSCC patients reported high anxiety scores and lower depression levels than control patients, although there was overlap between the groups. N stage was associated with high anxiety scores and depression levels, whereas T stage was only associated with depression levels. Both anxiety scores and depression levels at diagnosis predicted prognosis through an association with TNM stage. Sense of humor, but not depression levels or anxiety scores, at diagnosis predicted QoL and depression levels at follow-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据