4.6 Article

Central nervous system injury triggers hepatic CC and CXC chemokine expression that is associated with leukocyte mobilization and recruitment to both the central nervous system and the liver

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 166, 期 5, 页码 1487-1497

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62365-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0300456] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline
  3. MRC [G0300456] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0300456] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The administration of hiterleukin-1 beta to the brain induces hepatic CXC chemokine synthesis, which increases neutrophil levels in the blood, liver, and brain. We now show that such hepatic response is not restricted to the CXC chemokines. CCL-2, a CC chemokine, was released by the liver in response to a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha challenge to the brain and boosted monocyte levels. Furthermore, a clinically relevant compression injury to the spinal cord triggered hepatic chemokine expression of both types. After a spinal cord injury, elevated CCL-2 and CXCL-1 mRNA and protein were observed in the liver by TaqMan reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as early as 2 to 4 hours. Simultaneously, we observed elevated levels of these chemokines and circulating leukocyte populations in the blood. Leukocytes; were recruited to the liver at this early stage, whereas at the site of challenge in the central nervous system, few were observed until 24 hours. Artificial elevation of blood CCL-2 triggered dose-dependent monocyte mobilization in the blood and enhanced monocyte recruitment to the brain after TNF-alpha challenge. Attenuation of hepatic CCL-2 production with corticosteroids resulted in reduced monocyte levels after the TNF-alpha challenge. Thus, combined production of CC and CXC hepatic chemokines appears to amplify the central nervous system response to injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据