4.7 Article

Serial crystalluria determination and the risk of recurrence in calcium stone formers

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 67, 期 5, 页码 1934-1943

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00292.x

关键词

crystalluria; stone recurrence; hypercalciuria; diuresis; calcium oxalate; nephrolithiasis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Urinary crystal precipitation is the necessary initial step in kidney stone formation. However, clinical relevance of crystalluria in the evaluation of stone formers is disputed. Methods. We serially determined crystalluria in first-voided morning urine samples, together with full 24-hour urine biochemistry, in 181 patients with idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis who had formed at least one calcium-oxalate stone and were followed for at least 3 years under our care. All stone events which occurred prior to referral, then after entry in the study were recorded. Results. As compared with 109 patients who had no evidence of stone recurrence during follow-up, the 72 patients who experienced >= one recurrent stone event had a lower daily urine volume (1.74 +/- 0.06 vs. 2.26 +/- 0.05 L/day (mean +/- SEM) (P < 0.0001), higher urine calcium and oxalate concentrations, and daily calcium excretion, and they had more frequent crystalluria (68% vs. 23% of urine samples) (P < 0.0001). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, the hazard ratio for stone recurrence was 0.32 (95% CI 0.16-0.62) for 1 L increase in daily urine volume, 1.12 (1.09-1.24) for 1 mmol/L increase in urine calcium concentration, 1.24 (1.02-1.50) for 0.1 mmol/L increase in urine oxalate concentration and 27.8 (10.2-75.6) for crystalluria index. Conclusion. These data provide evidence that crystalluria, when repeatedly found in early morning urine samples, is highly predictive of the risk of stone recurrence in calcium stone formers. Serial search for crystalluria, a simple and cheap method, may be proposed as a useful tool for the monitoring of calcium stone formers, in addition to urine biochemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据