4.6 Article

Usefulness of diffusion/perfusion-weighted MRI in rat gliomas: Correlation with histopathology

期刊

ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 640-651

出版社

ASSOC UNIV RADIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.01.024

关键词

C6 gliomas; MR diffusion-weighted imaging; perfusion-weighted imaging; pathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale and Objectives. Diffusion/perfusion-weighted MRI (DWI/PWI) can provide additional useful information in the diagnosis of patients with brain gliomas in a noninvasive fashion. However, the exact role of these new techniques is still undergoing evaluation. Our hypothesis was that DWI and PWI could be useful for assessment of growth and vascularity of implanted C6 rat gliomas. Materials and Methods. Thirty-six rats were implanted with C6 glioma cells intracerebrally. Between 1 and 4 weeks after implantation, 8-10 rats were imaged on a clinical, 1.5-T whole-body magnetic resonance system with T-1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T-2-weighted imaging, DWI, PWI, and postcontrast T1WI at each weekly time point. All tumors were examined histologically; tumor cellularity and microvascular density were counted. Results. On DWIs, statistical differences of apparent diffusion coefficient values for both the tumoral core and peritumoral region were present comparing tumors of 3-4 weeks' growth with tumors of 1-2 weeks' growth. Apparent diffusion coefficient value of tumoral core was negatively correlated with tumor cellularity (r = -0.682, P <.01). Statistical difference of maximal regional cerebral blood volume of tumoral core was present comparing 2-4 weeks with both 1 week after implantation and contralateral white matter (P <.01). Native vessel dilation in regions of normal brain at the periphery of the tumors at 1 week after implantation was observed. Correlation between maximal regional cerebral blood volume of tumor core and microvascular density was present (r = 0.716, P <.01). Conclusion. DWI and PWI has potential to characterize C6 gliomas in rats, which is a promising model similar to human gliomas. © AUR, 2005.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据