4.6 Article

Analysis of magnetic interactions in rare-earth-doped crystals for quantum manipulation -: art. no. 174409

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 71, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.174409

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of magnetic interactions in rare-earth-doped crystals under an external magnetic field has been studied in order to obtain an efficient three-level A system with the hyperfine levels of the rare earth. Nuclear Zeeman effect under the action of an external magnetic field removes the nuclear degeneracy. This interaction does not provide an efficient A system because nuclear-spin flipping such as vertical bar M-I]= +/- 1/2 -> vertical bar M-I]= -/+ 1/2 (M-I is the nuclear-spin projection) cannot be induced by an optical transition. However, this selection rule only applies to pure nuclear Zeeman effect. Indeed, it is shown that the coupling of the electronic Zeeman and of the hyperfine interactions releases the nuclear-spin selection rules Delta M-I=0. This can be described in terms of a pseudonuclear Zeeman effect induced by an effective magnetic field. The relative strengths of the two optical transitions involved in the three-level system can be controlled by the orientation of the external magnetic field. The particular case of the Tm3+ ion in the Y3Al5O12 host (YAG) is discussed. Tm3+ hyperfine structure is determined using a complete Hamiltonian including free-ion, crystal-field, and magnetic interactions. A good three-level A system is obtained in Tm:YAG with a transition strength ratio of 0.24 (similar to 1:4) between the two optical transitions. An analytical analysis based on a spin-Hamiltonian approach is proposed to explain the results of the complete crystal-field calculations. Finally, an experimental protocol that makes a crystal similar to the atomic samples used in previous quantum information investigations, with the additional benefits of absence of motion and long coherence time, is described.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据