4.6 Article

Application of a pH-sensitive fluoroprobe (C-SNARF-4) for pH microenvironment analysis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 71, 期 5, 页码 2501-2510

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2501-2510.2005

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An important feature of microbial biofilms is the development of four-dimensional physical and chemical gradients in space and time. There is need for novel approaches to probe these so-called microenvironments to determine their effect on biofilm-specific processes. In this study, we describe the use of seminaphthor-hodafluor-4F 5-(and-6) carboxylic acid (C-SNARF-4) for pH microenvironment analysis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. C-SNARF-4 is a fluorescent ratiometric probe that allows pH quantification independent of probe concentration and/or laser intensity. By confocal scanning laser microscopy, C-SNARF-4 revealed pH heterogeneity throughout the biofilm in both the x,y and x,z planes, with values ranging from pH 5.6 (within the biofilm) to pH 7.0 (bulk fluid). pH values were typically remarkably different than those just a few micrometers away. Although this probe has been successfully used in a number of eukaryotic systems, problems have been reported which describe spectral emission changes as a result of macromolecular interactions with the fluorophore. To assess how the biofilm environment may influence fluorescent properties of the dye, fluorescence of C-SNARF-4 was quantified via spectrofluorometry while the probe was suspended in various concentrations of representative biofilm matrix components (i.e., proteins, polysaccharides, and bacterial cells) and growth medium. Surprisingly, our data demonstrate that few changes in emission spectra occur as a result of matrix interactions below pH 7. These studies suggest that C-SNARF-4 can be used as a reliable indicator of pH microenvironments, which may help elucidate their influence on the medical and geobiological roles of natural biofilms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据