4.5 Article

Direct ANP inhibition of hypoxia-induced inflammatory pathways in pulmonary microvascular and macrovascular endothelial monolayers

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00294.2004

关键词

altitude; atrial natriuretic peptide; endothelial cell permeability; tumor necrosis factor-alpha; lipopolysaccharide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) has been shown to reduce hypoxia-induced pulmonary vascular leak in vivo, but no explanation of a mechanism has been offered other than its vasodilatory and natriuretic actions. Recently, data have shown that ANP can protect endothelial barrier functions in TNF-alpha-stimulated human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Therefore, we hypothesized that ANP actions would inhibit pulmonary vascular leak by inhibition of TNF-alpha secretion and F-actin formation. Bovine pulmonary microvascular (MVEC) and macrovascular endothelial cell (LEC) monolayers were stimulated with hypoxia, TNF-alpha, or bacterial endotoxin (LPS) in the presence or absence of ANP, and albumin flux, NF-kappa B activation, TNF-alpha secretion, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and F-actin (stress fiber) formation were assessed. In Transwell cultures, ANP reduced hypoxia-induced permeability in MVEC and TNF-alpha-induced permeability in MVEC and LEC. ANP inhibited hypoxia and LPS increased NF-kappa B activation and TNF-alpha synthesis in MVEC and LEC. Hypoxia decreased activation of p38 MAPK in MVEC but increased activation of p38 MAPK and stress fiber formation in LEC; TNF-alpha had the opposite effect. ANP inhibited an activation of p38 MAPK in MVEC or LEC. These data indicate that in endothelial cell monolayers, hypoxia activates a signal cascade analogous to that initiated by inflammatory agents, and ANP has a direct cytoprotective effect on the pulmonary endothelium other than its vasodilatory and natriuretic properties. Furthermore, our data show that MVEC and LEC respond differently to hypoxia, TNF-alpha-stimulation, and ANP treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据