4.6 Article

Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2: An androgen-dependent predictor of prostate cancer survival

期刊

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
卷 47, 期 5, 页码 695-702

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.12.015

关键词

IGF; IGFBP-2; androgen; prostate cancer; PSA failure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Evidence suggests that the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) family is important in prostate cancer. We evaluate the ability of IGF markers to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) following radical prostatectomy (RRP). Methods: Preoperative sera from 141 patients undergoing RRP were analyzed for IGF-I, IGFBP-I, IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-3. A multivariate Cox model was created to assess the ability of these markers to predict bRFS. Preoperative covariables included: biopsy Gleason score, clinical TNM stage, serum PSA and neoadjuvant hormonotherapy. Kaplan-Meier curves were stratifying by IGF cutpoints (determined by ROC analysis) and hormonotherapy status. Results: Average follow-up was 6.92 years, median PSA was 6.9 ng/ml and 85.1% of patients had cT2NxM0 disease. 49 patients experienced a PSA failure. Average levels of 1GF-I, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-3 were 156.5 ng/ml, 48.1 ng/ml, 396.8 ng/ml and 3303.7 ng/ml, respectively. IGFBP-2 was an independent predictor of PSA failure. Patients treated with neoadjuvant ADT (n = 71) and whom had high IGFBP-2 levels experienced a 5-year bRFS that was better than those with low IGFBP-2 levels (77.7% vs. 53.3%). Patients without neoadjuvant ADT whom had high IGFBP-2 levels had a 5-year bRFS that was worse than those with low IGFBP-2 levels (64.5% vs. 82.7%). Conclusions: Preoperative IGFBP-2 predicts post-radical prostatectomy bRFS and is independent of stage, Gleason score and PSA. Increased IGFBP-2 is associated with better survival in patients with neoadjuvant hormonotherapy but worse survival in those without, suggesting a dramatic switch in function of this protein dependant on the presence or absence of androgens. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据