4.7 Article

Butyrate blocks interferon-γ-inducible protein-10 release in human intestinal subepithelial myofibroblasts

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 40, 期 5, 页码 483-489

出版社

SPRINGER TOKYO
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-005-1573-4

关键词

IBD; Th1 cell; CXCR3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Interferon (IFN)-gamma-inducible protein (IP)-1.0 is a chemoattractant for CXCR 3-expressing T lymphocytes and monocytes. IP-10 has been reported to mediate chronic inflammation such as that in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the local secretion of IP-10 in the intestine remains unclear. In this study, we investigated IP-10 secretion in human colonic subepithelial myofibroblasts (SEMFs). Methods. IP-10 secretion was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and IP-10 mRNA expression was evaluated by Northern blotting. Results. Interleukin (IL)-10 mRNA was not detected in unstimulated SEMFs. Interferon (IFN)-alpha, strongly induced IP-10 mRNA expression. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha also stimulated IP-10 mRNA expression, but this was much weaker than that induced by IFN-gamma. The effects of IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha were detected in a dose- and time-dependent manner. These responses were also observed at the protein levels. The IFN-gamma-induced IP-10 secretion was not affected by acetate or propionate, but was significantly reduced by butyrate. Trichostatin A, a specific inhibitor of historic deacetylase, also blocked the IFN-gamma- and TNF-alpha-induced IP-10 mRNA expression, but the effects of trichostatin A were weaker than those of butyrate. The inhibitory effect of butyrate on IFN-gamma-induced IP-10 release was not associated with STAT (signaling transducer and activator of transcription)-1 alpha activation. Conclusions. We demonstrated that human colonic SEMFs are the local site for the secretion IP-10. The regulation of IP-10 release by IFN-gamma and butyrate may play an important role in controlling chronic mucosal inflammation in pathological entities such as IBD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据