4.7 Article

Free fatty acid impairment of nitric oxide production in endothelial cells is mediated by IKKβ

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000160549.60980.a8

关键词

diabetes; endothelial dysfunction; endothelial nitric oxide synthase; free fatty acids; IKK beta; nitric oxide

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL67267, HL64228, HL18645, HL04346, HL04030] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-Free fatty acids (FFA) are commonly elevated in diabetes and obesity and have been shown to impair nitric oxide ( NO) production by endothelial cells. However, the signaling pathways responsible for FFA impairment of NO production in endothelial cells have not been characterized. Insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) regulation is critical for activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase ( eNOS) in response to stimulation by insulin or fluid shear stress. Methods and Results-We demonstrate that insulin-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and serine phosphorylation of Akt, eNOS, and NO production are significantly inhibited by treatment of bovine aortic endothelial cells with 100 mu mol/L FFA composed of palmitic acid for 3 hours before stimulation with 100 nM insulin. This FFA preparation also increases, in a dose-dependent manner, IKK beta activity, which regulates activation of NF-kappa B, a transcriptional factor associated with inflammation. Similarly, elevation of other common FFA such as oleic and linoleic acid also induce IKK beta activation and inhibit insulin-mediated eNOS activation. Overexpression of a kinase inactive form of IKK beta blocks the ability of FFA to inhibit insulin-dependent NO production, whereas overexpression of wild-type IKK beta recapitulates the effect of FFA on insulin- dependent NO production. Conclusions-Elevated levels of common FFA found in human serum activate IKK beta in endothelial cells leading to reduced NO production, and thus may serve to link pathways involved in inflammation and endothelial dysfunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据