4.5 Article

Synthetic peracetate tea polyphenols as potent proteasome inhibitors and apoptosis inducers in human cancer cells

期刊

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 1010-1023

出版社

BIOSCIENCE RESEARCH INST-BRI
DOI: 10.2741/1595

关键词

EGCG; polyphenols; pro-drug; proteasome inhibitors; apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been suggested that proteasome activity is essential for tumor cell proliferation and drug resistance development. We have previously shown that natural and synthetic ester bond-containing tea polyphenols are selective inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome. The most abundant catechin in green tea is (-)epigallocatechin-3-gallate [(-)-EGCG], which has been found by many laboratories to exhibit the most potent anticancer activity. We have reported that (-)-EGCG is also the most effective proteasome inhibitor among all the natural green tea catechins tested. Unfortunately, (-)-EGCG is very unstable in neutral and alkaline conditions. In an attempt to increase the stability and thus the efficacy, we synthesized several (-)-EGCG analogs with acetyl protected -OH groups as prodrugs. Here we report, for the first time, that these acetylated synthetic tea analogs are much more potent than natural (-)-EGCG in inhibiting the proteasome in cultured tumor cells. Consistently, these protected analogs showed much higher potency than (-)-EGCG to inhibit proliferation and transforming activity and to induce apoptosis in human leukemic, prostate, breast, and simian virus 40-transformed cells. Additionally, these protected analogs had greatly reduced effects on human normal and non-transformed cells. Therefore, these peracetate protected tea polyphenols are more efficacious than (-)-EGCG and possess great potential to be developed into novel anticancer drugs. Identification of the cytosolic metabolite(s) of peracetate-protected polyphenols in cultured tumor cells and examination of their in vivo tumor growth-inhibitory activity are currently underway in our laboratory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据